FREE CASE REVIEW
Firefighting foam is now typically used for securing flammable liquids, whether they’re actually on fire yet or not. It’s also sometimes used on regular items as well in order to aid the usage of water and make it more effective in fighting the flames. There are many different kinds of firefighting foam, each typically designed with a specific purpose in mind.
The types of fire that foams are designed to combat include:
Class A: normal flammable materials like paper, wood, rubber, cloth, and some plastics.
Class B: flammable liquids like oil, grease, gasoline, oil-based paints, solvents, alcohols, tars, and certain gasses.
Class C: electrical equipment.
Class D: combustible metals such as potassium, magnesium, titanium, zirconium, lithium, and sodium.
Class K: cooking appliances that use fats, vegetable oil, or animal-based oil.
Which type is used depends on the spread of the fire, what is on fire, and the nature of the room that contains the fire.
AFFF stands for aqueous film-forming foam and is a type of firefighting foam. It’s typically used to fight Class B fires, which are those involving flammable liquids like oil and gasoline. AFFF is produced both for portable fire extinguishers and for firefighters to use in firefighting.
PFAS are what make the film in an AFFF. They work by creating a film on top of the flammable liquid, which cuts the liquid off from the oxygen in the air that feeds the fire. Deprived of the oxygen it needs, the fire wouldn’t be able to continue to burn.
The general public can be exposed to PFAS through the following:
Certain workers are more likely to be exposed to PFAS than others:
Exposure to PFAS in AFFF has been linked to several different cancers. It’s usually long-term exposure to AFFF that results in a buildup of PFAS in the body that can cause cancer to form. AFFF can, according to FEMA, enter the body via inhalation, absorption through the skin, or through oral ingestion. This means that both people who regularly work with AFFF and those exposed to it through the proximity in their community may be at risk of developing one of the following cancers.
The symptoms of prostate cancer can include:
The symptoms of testicular cancer can include:
The symptoms of kidney cancer can include:
The symptoms of liver cancer can include:
In its early stages, there typically aren’t any symptoms. In the later stages of pancreatic cancer, symptoms can include:
Replacements for AFFF have been in development for around a decade. Many of these foams’ manufacturers claim that they work against fires without using the chemicals that are present in AFFF. Tests have been ongoing and while initial reports show that the tests are going well, the new foams work differently from AFFF and therefore a transition is more complicated than simply switching over to a new foam. Additionally, many of these foams are, while effective, aren’t as good as AFFF at dousing fire and much more of the foam would be required to smother the same amount of flame than would be needed with AFFF.
Another issue that comes with replacing AFFF is that any new foam may be used differently. Experts agree that replacing AFFF is necessary due to the risks to health and the environment, but there are some additional costs involved with replacement foam options. Some of these costs may come in the form of training, as while new foam options are available, they are different to use than AFFF and firefighters would need to learn new techniques in order to use them to combat fires. Additionally, any fire department that still had leftover AFFF would need to figure out how to safely dispose of the older foam in a way that wouldn’t contaminate water sources.
A number of lawsuits have been filed against the manufacturers of AFFF, which include 3M, DuPont, and others. The first wave of lawsuits began in 2017, claiming that AFFF manufacturers were aware of the link between AFFF and cancer and failed to warn of the risks. As lawsuits began to pile up, they were consolidated into an MDL (multidistrict litigation), and by 2023, the class-action MDL lawsuit involved thousands of cases.
As of 2023, the specific case City of Stuart v. 3M Co., et al. is being tried as a bellwether case. This is a test trial that occurs with a few select cases prior to the MDL. The idea is for the initial bellwether cases to function as a benchmark. The other MDL cases are similar in nature to the bellwether case and so the results can be a good indication of how subsequent trials may fare in court.
If you were exposed to AFFF consistently for more than 5 years, either through gear exposure or via your drinking water, you may have a case against the AFFF manufacturer if you also developed one of the following cancers:
free case review